Although some electoral subjects have started campaigning too early and managed to get non-competitive advantages for the certain candidates and parties, the official registration of candidates has finished only on 1 October. Thus, the candidates are allowed to organize campaign efforts in accordance with the Law since this date. We haven't noticed that territorial election commissions would unreasonably refuse to register candidates on a systematic basis.

However, OPORA's observers have often recorded conflicts between commissions and electoral subjects, which often appealed to the court against resolutions on refusal to register candidates. In most cases, the courts satisfied demands of candidates and parties and obliged commissions to comply with the law and register the corresponding candidates. One of the most resonant conflict has occurred in Sloviansk. It concerned registration of Opposition Bloc's candidate for city mayor, and resulted in prematurely terminated authority of Sloviansk Election Commission by the CEC.

OPORA's observers have noticed that there are many technical errors and corrections on the stage of paperwork and submission of documents to election commissions. For example, incomplete set of documents, inaccuracies in the documents, violated procedure of making a monetary pledge, failure to inform commissions about party conferences, violated limitations of simultaneous nomination to different representative bodies and to different offices. All this is due to the lack of information electoral subjects have and their misunderstanding of the corresponding election law standards. Thus, commissions were legitimately refusing to register candidates due to such errors and violations.

Party meetings and conferences dedicated to nomination of candidates were held in accordance with Law requirements and within the established time constraints. Although there were some incidents when journalists were barred from entering party conferences, we didn't notice significant violations at this stage of the election process. The main problem was the lack of public information about party conferences, and mostly in oblast centers and big cities. Most of local party cells have informed election commissions about upcoming conferences. However, it should be mentioned that not all the territorial election commissions attended party conferences. We can explain this by the fact that TEC members are not directly obliged to attend party conferences and, besides that, many parties were holding them on the last days established by the Law.

OPORA hasn't noticed any violations of the Law of Ukraine on Condemnation of Communist and National Socialistic (Nazi) Totalitarian Regimes in Ukraine and Ban on the Propaganda of Their Symbols in relation to candidates nominated by local party cells, their activities, names or symbols.

Although the technology of candidates-doubles was actively used in the certain regions, mostly in election of city mayors, it was not widespread. This problem was usually resolved by such 'technical' candidates withdrawing their candidacies by themselves.

Local cells of the Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity' party have nominated the highest number of candidates to oblast, raion, city, raion in city councils where new electoral system is applied (almost 28 thousand persons).

Local cells of AUU Batkivshchyna, Radical Party of Oleh Liashko, Opposition Bloc, Ukrainian Union of Patriots – UKROP, Nash Krai, AUU Svoboda, Revival, and Agrarian Party of Ukraine have the best representation. These 9 political parties have registered from 10 to 28 thousand candidates in multi-mandate election districts.

Local cells of the other 17 political parties have registered from 1 to 5 thousand candidates in multi-mandate election districts. The other 96 parties are represented only in some territorial communities, and have smaller number of candidates (less than 1 thousand). Thus, 122 of 142 political parties, which have approved participation of their local cells in local elections, nominated the candidates.

Although the requirements concerning balanced representation of both sexes in electoral lists is poorly regulated by the Law, electoral subjects were trying to realize this principle. Only Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity', Agrarian Party of Ukraine, and Nash Krai party have managed to secure 30% representation of each gender in election lists from parties with the highest number of candidates for oblast council members. The average number of women candidates for oblast council members in electoral lists of these parties was 20%, 23% and 29% respectively. However, there are 13 % of women candidates for city mayors in the whole country.

 

CONFERENCES HELD BY LOCAL PARTY CELLS AND NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES

According to the Law, local party cells shall nominate their candidates at a meeting (conference) organized in accordance with party statute. Local party cells shall notify in writing the relevant territorial election commission about the date, time and place of holding meeting (conference) no later than one day before the day of the meeting or conference. Members of the territorial election commissions have the right to attend such meetings (conferences). Besides that, local party cells shall inform mass media about the time and place of holding a meeting (conference) dedicated to nomination of candidates. Mass media accreditation procedures for such meeting (conference) is established by an organizer.

However, there were instances when parties failed to inform election commissions about such conferences. For example, in Putyla raion of Chernivtsi oblast, raion cell of the Agrarian Party of Ukraine had failed to inform the commission about its conference and, therefore, the commission refused to register party's list of candidates to raion council. Representatives of Cherkasy oblast cell of the Radical Party of Oleh Liashko informed Cherkasy Oblast Election Commission about the conference less than 24 hours before the event. On the contrary, city and oblast cells of the Nash Krai party in the city of Cherkasy held their conferences earlier than the date announced to journalists. Svativ city cell of the Nash Krai party (Luhansk oblast) informed the local TEC about conference on the day it was held. It's a direct violation of Article 37 (5) of the Law on Local Elections. In Krasnyi Lyman (Donetsk oblast), local cells of the AUU Batkivshchyna, Radical Party of Oleh Liashko, Nova Derzhava party, and Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity'

REJECTION OF CANDIDATE NOMINATIONS

The Law on Local Elections establishes a number of requirements for nomination and registration of candidates, which can became a basis for rejection of candidates to village, settlements, city heads and headmen by territorial election commissions if not adhered to. Errors and inaccuracies detected in documents submitted for registration of candidates shall be subject to correction and shall not be a reason for refusing to register the MP candidate. A decision on refusal of registration of a candidate shall contain a complete list of the grounds for refusal. Electoral subjects had an opportunity to appeal against a decision, actions or inaction of a territorial election commission to the court.

In Cherkasy oblast, Cherkasy City Election Commission has refused to register 12 candidates from the list of the Party of Free Democrats on the basis of Article 38 (7) of the Law of Ukraine on Local Elections – the absence of mandatory information in autobiographies: the citizenship of one candidate, party affiliation of three candidates, and public activities of eleven candidates. The Party of Free Democrats, for its part, filed a complaint to Cherkasy District Administrative Court, which has partially satisfied it and ascertained that resolution of the TEC is unlawful.

Cherkasy City Election Commission refused to register lists of candidates to Cherkasy City Council and mayoral candidates, submitted by the Party of Simple People and People's Labour Union. The refusal was based on non-conformity of the documents proving registration of parties to the established requirements. Cherkasy District Administrative Court refused to satisfy the claim filed by People's Labour Union party against the TEC. The Party of Simple People didn't appeal to the court. Besides that, Cherkasy Election Commission refused to register 8 candidates from the Democratic Alliance, including the first one in the list. Cherkasy District Administrative Court has partially satisfied the appeal: TEC resolution was considered unlawful.

In Chernihiv oblast, Chernihiv City Election Commission refused to register 3 candidates for city mayor due to the errors in documentation. Mena Raion Election Commission refused to register a candidate to raion council from the UKROP party, who was simultaneously registered as a self-nominated candidate for village head of Berezhne. Novhorod-Siverska City Election Commission refused to register candidate of the Radical Party of Oleh Liashko, who was already registered as a self-nominated candidate for village head of Kovpynka.

In Chernivtsi, city and oblast TECs refused to register candidate Drahosh Kozma from the Radical Party of Oleh Liashko. The refusal was based on the fact that the candidate failed to submit a complete set of documents (only passport copy and unsigned autobiography was submitted). Putyla Raion Election Commission refused to register the list of candidates submitted by Putyla raion cell of the Agrarian Party of Ukraine because the party had failed to inform it about the date and place of party conference. In Storozhynets raion, raion election commission refused to register Rehina Ionashky, who was nominated in district #21 by two nominating entities: People's Party and Opposition Bloc. The parties didn't appeal against commission resolutions.

Dnipropetrovsk City TEC refused to register candidates to local council and mayoral candidate Ivan Stupak, submitted by the Socialists party. Reason: according to the commission, decision of the party on participation in the elections looks like original document, but not a copy (in both instances), and discrepancies in autobiography of a mayoral candidate. Dnipropetrovsk District Administrative Court has partially satisfied demands of the claimant and obliged the commission to accept nomination documents one more time. Besides that, the commission refused to register candidates to local council from the Democratic Alliance and the Revival party, as well as a mayoral candidate Anatolii Krupskyi from the latter. The reason – monetary pledge was submitted by the head of local party cell as a physical person, but not as a representative of the local cell. The first instance court (Dnipropetrovsk District Administrative Court) has partially satisfied demands of the claimant and obliged the commission to accept nomination documents one more time.

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast TEC had registered both the Socialists party and Revival party despite the sets of documents were identical to those submitted to the City TEC. Nonetheless, the commission rejected the other documents of these parties. For example, the Socialists party didn't submit 30 personal written consents to run (these candidates were not registered). Decision of the Revival party containing the list of candidates had discrepancies with the list of districts. The commission had put this issue to a vote and decided to consider these discrepancies as inaccuracies. In Vasylkiv raion, parties Nash Krai and Narodnyi Kontrol (People's Oversight) Civic Movement were refused for registration because they had failed to submit income declarations and applications on participation in the elections.

In Donetsk oblast, Kramatorsk City Election Commission refused to register candidates to Kramatorsk City Council from local cell of the Hromada i Zakon party on the basis of CEC's refusal to register the party itself. Kramatorsk Election Commission took a decision on its meeting to refuse to register candidates for Kramatorsk City Council, submitted by local cell of the Nova Derzhava political party (due to the paperwork inaccuracies).

Sloviansk City Election Commission faced a conflict while registering Opposition Bloc's mayoral candidate V. Liakh. Thus, commission members had been trying to take a decision on candidate registration for four days (four sittings). Even after the CEC had answered to an appeal from Commission Head N. Kurdiukova and a commission member representing the Radical Party of Oleh Liashko with a written and oral explanations concerning commissions' responsibility for a failure to take decision, the commission didn't manage to decide on registration of V. Liakh. Thus, representatives of the Opposition Bloc party had appealed to the court and Donetsk District Administrative Court ruled that inaction of the city territorial election commission is unlawful but, however, it didn't oblige it to register V. Liakh as a mayoral candidate. As a result, the CEC had prematurely terminated the powers of Sloviansk Election Commission due to a gross violation of the Law of Ukraine on Local Elections, and obliged a newly-created commission to decide on registration of V. Liakh.

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast Election Commission refused to register five candidates of the People's Movement of Ukraine because their sets of documents lacked income declarations and pictures of candidates. Bohorodchany Raion TEC refused to register candidates to raion council from the People's Movement of Ukraine because there was a non-conformity between signatures in submitted documents. Kolomyia City Election Commission refused to register 7 candidates from Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity' due to the discrepancies between the election list and registration documents.

Candidates to Kharkiv Oblast Council from regional cell of the Opposition Bloc political party in Kharkiv oblast were not registered by oblast TEC. Violation of party meeting (conference) requirements was one of the reasons why the party received a rejection. Thus, Kharkiv Oblast Election Commission didn't receive an announcement about a meeting (conference) from the nominating entity. The election commission, however, had received a notification from regional cell of the Law and Order political party in Kharkiv oblast informing that it was renamed into “Regional cell of the Opposition Bloc political party in Kharkiv oblast”. On the very next day, Kharkiv Oblast Election Commission received from the party a notification about the time and place of its conference. However, commission representative wasn't allowed to enter the conference when he arrived. The Commission assessed this fact as a violation of meeting (conference) procedure and, therefore, refused to register candidates of this party.

In the city of Kherson and Skadovsk, Kherson TEC refused to register a candidate for Kherson City Head Volodymyr Saldo. The refusal was based on the fact that Mr. Saldo was nominated as number one candidate from the Nash Krai political party and, according to the data of the Ministry of Justice as of 30 September 2015, he is a member of the Party of Regions. Thus, the territorial election commission was obliged to consider registration documents repeatedly as a result of appeal to the court. Besides that, Kherson TEC also refused to register candidates of the Khersontsi political party due to the paperwork inaccuracies.

In Mykolaiv oblast, Voznesensk City Election Commission refused to register Yurii Kret, who was nominated to city council by the Revival political party, because, according to the data of the Ministry of Justice, he is the Head of local cell of the Front for Change.

Skadovsk City Election Commission refused to register local cells of the Svoboda party and Spravedlyvist party. The reason for rejection was a violation of the Law of Ukraine on Local Elections, particularly a requirement concerning a minimum of 30 percent of each gender in lists of candidates to local councils (Article 4 (3)). Representatives of the Svoboda party claimed they are going to challenge the decision of Skadovsk City TEC in court.

In Khmelnytsk oblast, Kamianets-Podilskyi City Election Commission refused to register more than 100 candidates to Kamianets-Podilskyi City Council and two candidates for city mayor. Candidates of Party of Honor, Fight with Corruption and Organized Crime, as well as electoral lists of AUU Batkivshchyna and AUU Svoboda were all rejected. Besides that, city mayor candidate Oleh Tkachuk from the AUU Batkivshchyna and three candidates of the For Real Deeds party were rejected too. They appealed against resolutions of Kamianets-Podilstyi TEC to Khmelnitskyi Administrative Court. The Court ruled that the resolutions are unlawful. In addition, the TEC refused to register candidates to local councils nominated by the Nash Krai party, one candidate from the People's Party and two from the Opposition Bloc. These 5 candidates, however, didn't appeal to the court.

In Krasyliv, raion election commission refused to register 5 candidates from the Batkivshchyna, as long as all of them indicated the same district number in registration documents. Khmelnytskyi Raion Election Commission refused to register a list of candidates from the People's Movement of Ukraine (Rukh) (incomplete set of documents, the absence of monetary pledge). In the city of Volochysk, local TEC refused to register candidates submitted by raion cell of the Patriot political party because the party failed to inform the TEC about a place and time of its conference in written. Novoushytska TEC refused to register candidates submitted by local cell of the UKROP party because it had submitted registration documents after the deadline. Chemerivtsi TEC refused to register candidates submitted by the Opposition Block because it wasn't informed about the conference in written.

Kirovohrad Oblast Election Commission refused to register candidates from three political parties: Party of Pensioners of Ukraine (paperwork inaccuracies – notarial certificate without a certification date); the Socialists political party and All-Ukrainian Union Svoboda (procedure of submitting the monetary pledge was violated). Two political parties have successfully challenged the decision of TEC. As for the third party, the TEC had reconsidered its decision and registered it.

Three self-nominated candidates for Kyiv mayor were not registered. Two of them failed to submit the necessary monetary pledge, and one sent the documents by mail, what is contrary to law requirements. Commission also refused to register some candidates from the Agrarian Party of Ukraine because their sets of documents lacked personal statements of consent to be nominated.

Kyiv Oblast Election Commission refused to register the Party of Motherland Defenders, which have informed the CEC about its conference by mistake. Ivankiv TEC refused to register candidates from the AUU Batkivshchyna because the set of documents was incomplete. Bohuslav City Election Commission refused to register one candidate from party list of the Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity' because the surname in passport differed from those in registration documents.

In Luhansk oblast, Kreminna Raion Election Commission refused to register 5 candidates from the All-Ukrainian Union Batkivshchyna and 2 candidates from the Nash Krai political party (incomplete set of documents). However, nominating entities didn't challenge decisions of the election commission.

Commission refused to register candidates from the Svativ local cell of the Agrarian Party of Ukraine because of technical errors and inaccuracies in documents, as well as late notification about party conference dedicated to nomination of candidates to Svativ City Council.

Eduard Vysochyn from the Nash Krai political party was refused in registration as a candidate to Novopskov Raion Council because he is Deputy Head of Taniushivka Village Territorial Election Commission.

Lysychansk city cell of the People's Party was registered in registration because it failed to submit the monetary pledge in accordance with the procedure. Besides that, candidate submitted by the Opposition Bloc was rejected due to his affiliation in the Communist Party despite he is unaffiliated according to his autobiography. Nash Krai political party was refused in registration because the set of registration documents lacked a copied decision of party's central administrative body concerning participation of its local cells in the corresponding election. Candidate for Lysychansk City Council Volodymyr Khapchuk, submitted by the Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity' party was not registered due to inaccuracies in district number.

In Lviv oblast (the city of Radekhiv), candidates from local cell of the Opposition Bloc party were not registered because the party failed to inform the TEC about its conference. Novyi Rozdil City Territorial Election Commission refused to register candidates from two political parties. One party was Democratic Alliance, which didn't manage to choose its number one in the list on its conference held in the morning of September 30. Thus, when the party submitted electoral lists with vacant number 1, the TEC refused to register them. The other party was the For Real Deeds political party, which has failed to officially announce the list of candidates on its conference and, therefore, violated the procedure. Representatives of the party appealed against illegitimate actions of the commission, which had groundlessly refused to register the list of candidates. Lviv District Administrative Court satisfied the claim and ruled that actions of Novyi Rozdil City Territorial Election Commission were unlawful.

Yavorivsk City Election Commission refused to register candidates submitted by city cell of the Civic Position party. The refusal was based on the fact that the documents were signed by the head of raion cell, but not oblast cell, and the set of documents wasn't complete. The party announced that itwas going to challenge this decision in court.

Starosambirsk Raion Election Commission refused to register electoral list of the Nash Krai political party. The reason was non-observance of gender quota requirements, as long as the list comprised 15 men only.

  Odesa Oblast Election Commission refused to register 27 candidates, submitted by local cell of the Revival party. The refusal was due to the non-compliance or absence of the registration documents (for example, Odesa Oblast Election Commission didn't receive any personal statements of consent to be nominated because they were sent to other election commissions). Decision of the corresponding TEC was canceled by court, what means the repeated consideration of registration documents from this local party cell.

REGISTRATION OF NAMESAKE CANDIDATES

Uman City Election Commission in Cherkasy oblast registered mayoral candidate Anatolii Anatolliovych Yatsenko from the Nash Krai partyy (a namesake of MP elected in SMD #200 (centered in the city of Uman) who is also a number one candidate in the electoral list of the Revival party, nominated to Cherkasy Oblast Council). However, he has removed his candidacy sometime later. In the city of Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, current Head of Raion Council Anatolii Ivanovych Haidai was registered as a self-nominated candidate for citry mayor. He is a surnamesake of Oleksandr Vasyliovych Haidai, who is effective City Mayor and a mayoral candidate from the Now Policy party. However, Anatolii Ivanovych Haidai has removed his candidacy.

Volkul Yevhen Romanovych is registered as a candidate for Dnipropetrovsk City Mayor (surnamesake of Oleksandr Vilkul). Dnipropetrovsk City and Oblast TEC registered the Revival of Ukraine party (namesake of the Revival party), which candidates in top of its electoral list are also namesakes of top candidates in the list of the authentic party.

Republican Platform party is registered in election to Dnipropetrovsk City Council. The party has candidate VladyslaV Ihorevych Filatov the first in its electoral list. However, candidate of the UKROP party Borys Albertovych Filatov has the same surname. Revival of Ukraine party is registered in election to Kryvyi Rih City Council, with candidate S. R. Karamanits on the first number in electoral list. The Revival party, however, has candidate K. F. Karamanits in the top of its list.

Two registered candidates for Kherson City Mayor bear surname Mykolaienko. One of them – Volodymyr Vasyliovych – is current Mayor of the city, and the other – Volodymyr Ivanovych is Ukrainian citizen living in Kyiv.

In Kyiv oblast, Vasylkiv City Election Commission registered two candidates bearing the same name Valerii Popovych, and only patronymics are different – Vasyliavych and Fedorovych. Valerii Fedorovych was born in 1951, and has already been a mayor of Vasylkiv. Valerii Vasyliovych was born in 1994 in Lutsk. There are two candidates for city mayor in the city of Yahotyn – Dziuba Nataliia Mykolaivna (current Mayor of Yahotyn), and Dziuba Valentyna Mykolaivna (works in Yahotyn Pension Fund). In the city of Irpin, Melnychuk Bohdan Omelianovych (AUU Svoboda) and Melnychuk Yevhen Volodymyrovych (unaffiliated and temporarily unemployed, born in 1982) are candidates for city mayor. Herashchenko Volodymyr Mykolaiovych (Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity') and Herashchenko Petro Oksentiiovych (self-nominated, born in 1950) are candidates for Obukhiv city mayor.

There are two surnamesakes nominated for city mayor in Mykolaiv – Ihor Diatlov (Opposition Bloc) and Andrii Diatlov (self-nominated).

 

PARTICIPATION OF LOCAL PARTY CELLS IN ELECTIONS: MAJOR TRENDS AND CALCULATIONS

According to OPORA's calculations, 122 of 142 local cells of political parties which passed the corresponding decisions on participation in local elections have nominated and registered their candidates to oblast. raion, city, and raion in city councils.

Local cells of the following parties have nominated the highest number of candidates to oblast, raion, city, raion in city councils: Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity', AUU Batkivshchyna, Radical Party of Oleh Liashko, Opposition Bloc, Ukrainian Union of Patriots – UKROP, Nash Krai, AUU Svoboda, Revival party, and Agrarian Party of Ukraine.

Local cells of these 9 parties have nominated from 10 thousand candidates (Agrarian Party of Ukraine) to almost 28 thousand candidates (Petro Poroshenko Bloc 'Solidarity').

Найбільше висунутих кандидатів від партій | Create your own infographics

Кількість висунутих кандидатів на міських голів | Create your own infographics

Обласні ради | Create your own infographics

 

Міські ради | Create your own infographics

Table 7. Political parties, which have nominated more than 100 candidates to oblast, raion, city, and raion in city councils

United Centre political party	957
PATRIOT political party	927
Sovist Ukrainy political party	912
People's Front political party	867
New Faces political party	835
Party of Pensioners of Ukraine	828
Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists political party	788
Ukrainian Galician Party political party	763
PROGRESS POLITICAL PARTY	688
Spravedlyvist party	663
Party of Volunteers of Ukraine	661
Party of Local Self-Government political party	650
Ukrainian Republican Party	611
The Party of Greens of Ukraine	596
Volia Narodu political party	582
New Policy party	476
DemAlliance (Democratic Alliance) political party	460
Republican Platform political party	451
Union of Left-Wing Forces political party	448
Hromadska Syla party	402
Patriotic Party of Ukraine	393
Party of Motherland Defenders	354
All-Ukrainian Union Vidrodzhennia Ukrainy political party	354
KMKS-Party of Hungarians of Ukraine	352
5.10 political party	312
Ukrainian Party Yednist	312
For Ukraine! political party	236
Auto-Maidan political party	222
Trust Deeds political party	216
Ukrainian Marine Party of Serhii Kivalov	211
Party of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of Ukraine	204
All-Ukrainian Union Center political party	188
Christian Democratic Union party	187
All-Ukrainian Chornobyl People's Party 'For Welfare and Social Protection of People'	181
People's Front political party	179
Party of Honor, Fight with Corruption and Organized Crime	166
Syla Hromad political party	163
PORUCH POLITICAL PARTY	156
Democratic Party of Hungarians of Ukraine	148
Peasant Party of Ukraine	147
Social-Democratic Party of Ukraine	142
Ukrainian Party	136
Republic political party	135
Officer Corps POLITICAL PARTY	133
Youth Party of Ukraine	132
Spilna Sprava Civic Movement political party	121
Pravo Narodu political party	121
Movement for Reforms political party	120
Liberal Party of Ukraine	106
Joint Action political party	105
Democratic Party of Hungarians of Ukraine	100

Table 7 “Political parties, which have nominated less than 100 candidates to oblast, raion, city, and raion in city councils”

National Democratic Party of Ukraine	98
PARTY OF DETERMINED CITIZENS political party	96
Good Samaritan political party	95
UNA-UNSO political party	93
National Democratic Party	90
Party of Free Democrats:	87
For Human Rights Party	85
Green Trident political party	85
Green Planet Ukrainian Party	82
Syla I Chest political party	73
Solidarity of Women of Ukraine party	72
HROMADA I ZAKON political party	64
The Greens political party	62
Tretia Syla political party	62
DARTH VADER BLOC political party	61
Liberal-Democratic Party of Ukraine	58
Vinnytsia European Strategy political party	55
RIDNYI DIM political party	54
Ukrainian Cossack Party political party	48
Solidarity of Right-Wing Forces political party	44
Party of Economic Revival of Ukraine political party	43
Social Christian Party	43
HROMADSKYI KONTROL ALL-UKRAINIAN UNION political party	41
Women for the Future All-Ukrainian Political Union	40
Yedyna Syla political party	35
All-Ukrainian party of Spirituality and Patriotism	34
Civic Solidarity political party	30
Narodnyi Kontrol political party	27
All-Ukrainian Union Hromada political party	26
Patriotic Movement political party	25
New Life political party	22
Slavonic party	22
Sylna Derzhava political party	20
Maibutnie Krainy political party	19
SAMOPOMICH political party	18
Ukraina Soborna political party	17
CHILDREN OF WAR PEOPLE'S PARTY OF UKRAINE political party	16
Social Party of Ukraine political party	16
The Socialist Party of Ukraine	16
Vidrodzhennia Ukrainy political party	15
Molod do VLADY party	14
Revival of Village party	4
Kontrol. Poriadok. Spravedlyvist political party	3
Ridna Kraina political party	3
Ukrainian Social Democratic Party (united)	1

[1]http://www.oporaua.org/news/8607-haos-iz-zastosuvannjam-gendernoji-kvoty-na-miscevyh-vyborah-je-prjamym-naslidkom-bezsystemnosti-zakonodavchoji-roboty-parlamentu-opora